What’s all the fuss about in Brownbackistan?

by Kari Ann Rinker, National Organization for Women (NOW), Kansas

March 15, 2012

reprinted from http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/article/2012/03/15/doctor-brownback-and-his-legislative-medical-team-pushes-through-omni-bus-mega-ab

News

Today HB 2598 was passed out of the Kansas House Federal and State Affairs committee.  As written about before here at RH, this is the most sweeping anti-choice bill in the nation.  Elizabeth Nash, state issues manager for the Guttmacher Institute in remarks about HB 2598 stated  “That is a level above and beyond what we have ever seen.”

Here are just a few provision of this sweeping 68 page abortion bill…

Prohibits the use of tax credits and tax exemptions for optional health insurance abortion coverage riders. 

These are abortion “riders” that were just instituted via legislation last year and were supposed to serve as a way for women to obtain optional abortion coverage in their private insurance companies, which was disallowed by the implementation of the law.  Now they cannot take this as a standard medical deduction.

Prohibits health care services provided by any state agency or any employee of a state agency from including abortion.

This one is a doozy…as it puts KU Medical School’s ob-gyn very accreditation at risk, but that’s the point according to Kansans for Life.  They want to cut off training for any “potential” abortion doctors in the state.  The insertion of a “sunset amendment”, postpones this possible accreditation loss for one year.  One pro-choice legislator stated…

“This gives the women of Kansas a year to flee the state,” said state Rep. Sean Gatewood, D-Topeka.

Prohibits school districts, their employees, volunteers and educational service providers and contractors from providing abortion services and prohibits school districts from allowing any person or entity that provides abortion services from offering, sponsoring or providing education materials about human sexuality.

This is an obvious attack on Planned Parenthood’s age appropriate and medically accurate sex ed programs.  It also provides the added bonus of preventing abortion physicians and possibly Planned Parenthood employees from volunteering at their children’s school.

Defines and prohibits civil action for a claim of “wrongful life” or “wrongful birth.”

This provision would allow physicians to lie to their patients about pregnancy complications that put the mother or the health of the fetus at risk.  It would also allow physician’s to opt out of such common medical testing as amniocentesis testing, which Kansans for Life referred to as “seek and destroy missions” during their committee testimony in favor of the bill.

That abortion includes “risk of premature birth in future pregnancies [and] risk of breast cancer”

This bill requires doctors to inform their patients of a non-existent increased risk of premature birth and breast cancer due to the woman’s abortion procedure.  In other words, physicians would be forced to violate their Hippocratic oath and be ordered to lie to their patients.

Creates new a new state income tax on any expense related to abortion and creates a new corporate income tax on abortion riders. 

This provision would actually allow the state of Kansas to profit from the abortions of women, even if those abortions are provided due to rape, incest or to prevent a substantial irreversible impairment to a bodily function.

The bill also excludes the threat of suicide from the definition of “substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function” for the purposes of seeking a later term abortion procedure.

When author of the bill Representative Lance Kinzer introduced it he stated, “This is what I did over my summer vacation”.  Tell him he should have gone to Disney World with his family instead of authoring attacks on women’s health and autonomy.

Chairman of the House Federal and State Affairs Committee, Representative Steve Brunk, gave opponents of the bill

Kansas Republicans look to profit off abortion taxes

By Stephen C. Webster
Friday, March 9, 2012
A doctor performing an abortion appears confused. Photo: Shutterstock, all rights reserved.
[ed. note, no attribution found for this photo but it’s too good to pass up – from Raw Story article]

Lawmakers in Kansas will consider next week a sweeping anti-abortion bill that would, among other things, levy sales taxes on any and all abortion procedures, related healthcare expenses and any company that might do business with an abortion provider — a proposal that could bring millions into state coffers, or just force clinics to shut down.

“Why not slap a $100, $200, $300 tax on an abortion?” Troy Newman, president of Operation Rescue, the largest anti-abortion advocacy group in Kansas, asked Raw Story on Friday. “I’m completely against most forms of taxation, but abortion is such an abhorrent procedure, I would like to see it wiped out with a $2,000 or $3,000 tax on every abortion that happens in Kansas.” [ed. note: this is the group that has been working with the Kansas Board of Healing Arts for the past several years. Their attorney, Richard Macias, who has no medical training that we are aware of, is now a member of the Kansas medical board.]

Massive in scope, H.B. 2598 includes provisions being considered in other states as well, like offering doctors immunity from malpractice lawsuits if they do not inform expectant mothers of prenatal health problems that could lead to an abortion; a removal of important tax credits provided to most healthcare institutions; requiring doctors to lie to patients by claiming that abortions may cause breast cancer; forcing women to hear the heartbeat of their fetus before an abortion; and even prohibiting state employees from contributing to the teaching of basic sexual health facts.

The sales tax, however — an innocuous-sounding 6.5 percent — is layered, effectively making it a repeating tax on every service rendered, every product purchased and every sale made in furtherance of an abortion. It also strips certain tax credits for companies that do business with women’s health providers, making such requests a potentially costly proposition.

“This is a complete turnaround in this idea of small government,” Elizabeth Nash, state issues manager for the Guttmacher Institute, told Raw Story. “Somebody spent hours, if not days, combing through the entire Kansas tax code to find every spot where you could possibly prevent abortion providers from being a non-profit healthcare provider. It’s really amazing. The bill is 68 pages long. Somebody spent days trying to figure out how to manipulate the tax code to disqualify abortion providers. That is a level above and beyond what we have ever seen.”

For individual women, it means financial penalties if a pregnancy must be terminated. The laws could also drive up the cost of abortions in the state, putting them out of reach for lower-income women. It could also make late term abortions to save the life of a mother, which can run up to $20,000, wholly cost prohibitive, even for middle class women.

Worse still, the bill’s prohibitions on teaching medical students how to perform abortions could even prevent Kansas public universities from producing licensed gynecologists – doctors who do much more than just facilitate the end of a pregnancy.

“This is the extreme nature of abortion politics in Kansas,” Kari Ann Rinker, state coordinator and lobbyist for pro-choice advocacy group Kansas Now, explained to Raw Story. “The problem for [anti-abortion groups] working on this bill is that they have become so greedy and cast that net so wide that they are passing legislation that stands in direct opposition of their stated no taxpayer funding for abortion. They are now passing legislation that does, indeed, make money for the state from abortion.”

“The tax code is simply not the place for social and religious engineering,” she added. “This is a very slippery slope here. What is next? Do we start taxing blood transfusions? Birth control? Drug treatment that is in opposition to some particular group’s moral standings?”

For Eric Scheidler, executive director of the Pro-Life Action League, the matter wasn’t as cut-and-dry.

“There would be, sort-of a moral question there,” he said. “You’ve got the state profiting from abortion the way I would think of gambling or tobacco, these kinds of things. Profiting off of people’s bad decisions, but that’s a bit morally problematic. But on the other hand, any measure that would tend to make abortion less profitable for the abortionists… is a good thing because we find that any time we can put some kind of brakes on the abortion industry, it tends to reduce abortion and save children.” [ed. note: Idiocy of truly Biblical proportions…]

“The idea that the taxpayers would be benefiting from abortion, yeah, that’s rather troubling. But at the same time, it certainly would not increase abortion, and it would be taking some of those profits away from the abortion industry. So, there’s not a direct participation in the industry.”

It is not yet clear if the Senate will pass H.B. 2598, but the House appears likely to do so. Kansas Governor Sam Brownback (R) has said he will sign the bill if it makes it to his desk.

only six days to review the entire 68 pages before giving it a hearing.  This is par for the course, as Chair Brunk works tightly with Kansans for Life lobby and Governor Brownback in pushing these bills through. Tell Chair Brunk and Governor Brownback that women’s healthcare deserves deliberation, consideration and respect.

The rubber-stamping of these unnecessary and harmful bills must stop! 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s